Recently, I was invited to weigh in on a LinkedIn post about AI. The question was whether using AI to create content counts as plagiarism if you don’t credit the AI.

I have a running list of all the ways business coaches talk about scaling without talking about intellectual property.

To be clear, I 🥰 business coaches, but I cannot overstate the importance that legal protection plays in scaling your business.

Love it or hate it (love it😊) – AI provides valuable leverage in your business when you let it do some of the non-expert work for you.

That said, AI introduces legal and ethical issues that must be navigated to ensure safe and profitable scaling.

A recent US Supreme Court decision regarding damages for copyright infringement prompted me to take a closer look at how these damages are calculated, with a deep dive into statutory damages.

You know I like to say IP is everywhere.

Well, the corollary to this is that IP trouble is everywhere—if you aren’t careful.

Use this cheat sheet to take a quick look at whether you own what you think you own. Intellectual property ownership has nothing to do with possession or even who paid for its creation.

How about a little AI issue-spotting exercise? If you wonder what lawyers do all day, this is it. 😊

“Issue spotting” means identifying legal issues within a factual scenario or a set of circumstances.

I got a super juicy question for this month’s LinkedIn Live:

"How to use AI to help create a curriculum with my own IP without permitting AI to use that IP when responding to prompts from others?"

So, of course, I had to ask ChatGPT. First, I got what I expected, but then I got something unexpected....

Proof that nothing beats in person connections! This conversation with Nate Hecker, CEO of Big Idea, was so good that I want to make sure you don’t miss it.